Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Hattaway

55 S.E. 21, 126 Ga. 333, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 379
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 17, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, -J.

The negligence claimed was based upon the existence of a “low place” in the track. Whether there was such a place was in issue-both in the pleadings and the evidence. It was therefore error fortlie judge in his charge to assume that there was such a “low place.”

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Hattaway, 55 S.E. 21, 126 Ga. 333, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 379 (Ga. 1906).

55 S.E. 21 (Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. Hattaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Casualty Co. v. Rucker
179 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)