Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. Rabinowitz

48 S.E. 326, 120 Ga. 864, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 725
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 9, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 326 (Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. Rabinowitz, 48 S.E. 326, 120 Ga. 864, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 725 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. As against a general demurrer, the petition set out a cause of action.

2. A ground of a motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence can not be considered when it does not appear that the objections therein stated were urged before the trial judge at the time the evidence was offered.

3. The requests to charge, so far as legal and applicable to the case, were fully covered by the general charge.

4. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Queen v. Hunnicutt
137 S.E.2d 45 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Bowden v. Bowden
53 S.E. 606 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.E. 326, 120 Ga. 864, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-birmingham-railroad-v-rabinowitz-ga-1904.