Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. Rabinowitz
This text of 48 S.E. 326 (Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. As against a general demurrer, the petition set out a cause of action.
2. A ground of a motion for new trial complaining of the admission of evidence can not be considered when it does not appear that the objections therein stated were urged before the trial judge at the time the evidence was offered.
3. The requests to charge, so far as legal and applicable to the case, were fully covered by the general charge.
4. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 326, 120 Ga. 864, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-birmingham-railroad-v-rabinowitz-ga-1904.