Atlantic Bank v. Frankford

61 N.C. 199
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

The plaintiff’s counsel moved to amend the affidavit by striking from it certain words, and the court allowed the motion.

It does not appear that it was sworn to again after it was thus amended. It was then no affidavit at all, and the plaintiff could not be convicted of perjury, if, as amended, it be false. The case stands then as if there were no affi *200 davit. An original attachment, without an affidavit to support it, is irregular, and may be quashed on motion.

There is error in the refusal to quash.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlantic Bank v. Frankford, 61 N.C. 199 (N.C. 1867).

61 N.C. 199 (Atlantic Bank v. Frankford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Shockley
142 N.E. 481 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1924)
Brown v. Rhinehart Bros.
16 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Sheldon v. . Kivett
14 S.E. 970 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
State v. . Norman
14 S.E. 968 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)