Atlantic B. T. Co. v. Neeley, Rec'r

159 S.E. 495, 161 S.C. 72, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 122
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 3, 1931
Docket13193
StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 495 (Atlantic B. T. Co. v. Neeley, Rec'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlantic B. T. Co. v. Neeley, Rec'r, 159 S.E. 495, 161 S.C. 72, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 122 (S.C. 1931).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

*77 The decision of this Court in the case of Ex Parte Wachovia Bank (Nettles v. Bank), 160 S. C., 104, 158 S. E., 214, is conclusive against the right of the respondent bank tó priority in the distribution of the assets of the insolvent bank. The Court sua sponte will take notice of the fact that the Act of 1927 (Act April 26, 1927 [35 St. at Large, p. 369]), upon which the plaintiff relies, was declared unconstitutional in the case cited. The order appealed from, which will be reported, is accordingly reversed.

Mr. Chief Justice Brease, and Messrs. Justices Stabler and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nettles v. People's Bank
158 S.E. 214 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 495, 161 S.C. 72, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlantic-b-t-co-v-neeley-recr-sc-1931.