Atlanta Wrecking Co. v. Etheridge

126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 341, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 745
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1925
Docket15981
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 21 (Atlanta Wrecking Co. v. Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta Wrecking Co. v. Etheridge, 126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 341, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 745 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The verdict in this case was authorized by the evidence and has the approval of the trial judge. In the light of the record as a whole, the special grounds of the motion for a new trial show no reversible error. The judgment overruling the motion for a new trial can not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 21, 33 Ga. App. 341, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-wrecking-co-v-etheridge-gactapp-1925.