Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Williams Brick Co.
This text of 138 S.E. 248 (Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Williams Brick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where on the hearing in the superior court of a certiorari to review a judgment of'the appellate division of the municipal court of Atlanta affirming a judgment of the trial judge denying a motion for a new trial, the record showed that in making the appeal the movant failed to file a statement of the grounds of such motion and it did not appear that the “brief of evidence and the grounds of said motion” were certified as true by the trial judge, as required by the act of July 31, 1925 (Ga. L. 1925, p. 370, § 42, C), the superior court could not do otherwise than dismiss the certiorari. Dean v. Johnson, 18 Ga. App. 661 (90 S. E. 286); Reese v. Miller, 33 Ga. App. 442 (126 S. E. 904); East River Nat. Bank v. Ellman, 36 Ga. App. 263 (136 S. E. 799). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 S.E. 248, 36 Ga. App. 814, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-west-point-railroad-v-williams-brick-co-gactapp-1927.