Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Mims
50 S.E. 137, 122 Ga. 422, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 227
Opinion
While the evidence for the plaintiff below is weak, the jury, by consent of both parties; were Neffnitted to personally inspect the premises where the tort was .committed, and, under the, rule laid down in City of Atlanta v. Milam, 95 Ga. 135, the judgment of the court below should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Mims, 50 S.E. 137, 122 Ga. 422, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 227 (Ga. 1905).
50 S.E. 137 (Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Mims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claxton Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coleman
22 S.E.2d 768 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Bean
174 S.E. 209 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Porter v. Georgia Power Co.
167 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
City of LaGrange v. Cotter
116 S.E. 204 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)