Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio
397 F.2d 250, 58 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 12,990
Opinion
This appeal questions the amount of the fees awarded counsel for plaintiffs in three actions to enforce awards of the Railway Adjustment Board. The statute, 45 U.S.C.A. § 153, subd. l(p), directs that the court allow a reasonable attorney’s fee when a plaintiff prevails in such cases. We are satisfied that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in the awards made here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio, 397 F.2d 250, 58 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 12,990 (5th Cir. 1968).
397 F.2d 250 (Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. E. Barron Plastics, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
397 F.2d 250 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)