Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio

397 F.2d 250, 58 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 12,990
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 25, 1968·No. 25354·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal questions the amount of the fees awarded counsel for plaintiffs in three actions to enforce awards of the Railway Adjustment Board. The statute, 45 U.S.C.A. § 153, subd. l(p), directs that the court allow a reasonable attorney’s fee when a plaintiff prevails in such cases. We are satisfied that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in the awards made here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio, 397 F.2d 250, 58 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 12,990 (5th Cir. 1968).

397 F.2d 250 (Atlanta Terminal Company and Southern Railway Company v. System Federation No. 21, Railway Employes' Department, Afl-Cio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related