Atlanta Paper Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

84 S.E.2d 359, 211 Ga. 185, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 519
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 14, 1954
Docket18714
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 S.E.2d 359 (Atlanta Paper Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta Paper Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 84 S.E.2d 359, 211 Ga. 185, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 519 (Ga. 1954).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Where, as here,- the petitioner, a nonresident railroad, brought an action ex contractu against a resident of this State for the collection of freight charges owing the petitioner, and by cross-action the defendant set off an action ex delicto for negligence, a court of equity will take jurisdiction thereof, under Code § 37-308, and this court has jurisdiction of the writ of error from the lower court. See Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co., 114 Ga. 921 (41 S. E. 74); Jacksonville Paper Co. v. Owen, 193 Ga. 23 (17 S. E. 2d 76).

Submitted September 17, 1954 Decided October 14, 1954 Rehearing denied November 10, 1954. Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, Sidney Has-kins, for plaintiff in error. Marshall, Greene & Neely, Burt DeRieux, contra.

2. However, where the cross-action, prays for damages in a stated amount against the railroad for the alleged failure to notify the consignor within a reasonable time that the consignee had failed to pay the freight charges, resulting in other goods being shipped and the alleged loss of the consignor’s accounts due to a petition in bankruptcy being filed against the consignee, the cross-action fails to allege any negligence or violation of any duty of the railroad which caused the loss of the consignor’s accounts due to the consignee becoming insolvent and a bankrupt, and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer thereto and in dismissing the same.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. Reeves Southeastern Corp.
576 S.E.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.E.2d 359, 211 Ga. 185, 1954 Ga. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-paper-co-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-ga-1954.