Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. Harris
88 S.E. 206, 144 Ga. 843, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 142
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 Ga. 214 →
Opinion
There is no complaint that any error of law was committed on the trial; and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict,, it was not erroneous for the trial judge to overrule the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. Harris, 88 S.E. 206, 144 Ga. 843, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 142 (Ga. 1916).
88 S.E. 206 (Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.