Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell

9 S.E.2d 625, 190 Ga. 437, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 480
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 11, 1940
Docket13191.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 S.E.2d 625 (Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta Gas-Light Company v. Farrell, 9 S.E.2d 625, 190 Ga. 437, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 480 (Ga. 1940).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

The Court of Appeals correctly held that the appliance in question became a part of the realty upon its installation as an adjunct of the furnace, and that as against the owner or a purchaser of the realty the tenant had no authority to contract with a conditional vendor for the removal of such appliance upon failure to pay the purchase money. Farrell v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co., 61 Ga. App. 18 (5 S. E. 2d, 607). The decision of the Court of Appeals appears to be correct as applied to the facts shown, and to afford no cause of complaint to the petitioner in certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burpee v. Athens Production Credit Asso.
15 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.E.2d 625, 190 Ga. 437, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-gas-light-company-v-farrell-ga-1940.