Atlanta Finance Co. v. Dean

133 S.E. 304, 35 Ga. App. 421, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 413
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1926·No. 16951; 16952·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The legal process, the use of which by the defendant is complained of by the plaintiff, having been used for the purpose which it was intended by law to. subserve, the present suits can not be maintained as actions-for malicious abuse of legal process. Nor were they maintainable on the theory that the previous legal proceeding was a malicious use of legal process, since the petition fails to allege that the [422]*422previous proceeding had terminated in favor of the defendant therein prior to the filing of the present actions for damages. It follows that the demurrer to the petition in each of the eases stated should have been sustained and the suits dismissed. Vandalsem v. Caldwell, 33 Ga. App. 88 (8), 90 (125 S. E. 716).

Decided May 14, 1926. Jackson & Moore, for plaintiff 'in error. Joseph D. Lewis, W. II. Lewis, contra.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlanta Finance Co. v. Dean, 133 S.E. 304, 35 Ga. App. 421, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 413 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

133 S.E. 304 (Atlanta Finance Co. v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medoc Corp. v. Keel
263 S.E.2d 543 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
American Plan Corp. v. Beckham
188 S.E.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Gaines v. Pirkle
199 S.E. 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)