Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Brown

167 S.E. 776, 46 Ga. App. 451, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 94
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1933
Docket22187
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 776 (Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Brown, 167 S.E. 776, 46 Ga. App. 451, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 94 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinions

Jenkins, P. J.

This suit is grounded squarely upon the doctrine of respondeat superior, that the act of the servant was the act of the master, done within the scope of and in the course of his employment. It is not based upon the theory that the master was negligent in employing unsuitable servants, such as in legal contemplation might have charged it with knowledge that the alleged tort would be committed. It is not intimated or suggested that the master did know or could possibly have known, anticipated, or suspected that the servant would do the acts complained of. That the servant is alleged to have become angered with the plaintiff and nursed a private grievance against her on account of her having reported him for a previous lack of efficiency in a prior transaction pertaining to the master’s business does not render the master liable for the act of his servant in stepping aside from the business in which he was then engaged and for which he was employed, and committing the tort complained of, wholly unrelated to the duties which he was performing and for which he was engaged.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, J., concurs. Stephens, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Chatham County Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission
458 S.E.2d 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Davis Gas Co. v. Powell
232 S.E.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Ditmyer v. American Liberty Insurance
160 S.E.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Southern Airways Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
127 S.E.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Ellington
87 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Prince v. Brickell
75 S.E.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Cooley v. Tate
73 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Gilbert v. Progressive Life Insurance
53 S.E.2d 494 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Coker v. Friedman
44 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Frazier v. Southern Railway Company
37 S.E.2d 774 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Stewart v. Peerless Furniture Co.
28 S.E.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Georgia Power Co. v. Shipp
24 S.E.2d 764 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Shipp v. Georgia Power Co.
21 S.E.2d 458 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Parker v. Smith
18 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Broome v. Primrose Tapestry Mills
200 S.E. 506 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Stafford v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
198 S.E. 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
American Security Co. v. Cook
176 S.E. 798 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Gomez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
172 S.E. 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Personal Finance Co. v. Whiting
172 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Atlanta Hub Co. v. Jones
171 S.E. 470 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 776, 46 Ga. App. 451, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-coca-cola-bottling-co-v-brown-gactapp-1933.