Atlanta & Carolina Railway v. Hollingsworth

84 S.E. 583, 143 Ga. 276, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 9, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. Under the peculiar facts of this case, the court did not err in appointing a receiver.

2. Had the evidence which was rejected been admitted, it should not have changed the result.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent, and Lumpkin, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlanta & Carolina Railway v. Hollingsworth, 84 S.E. 583, 143 Ga. 276, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 389 (Ga. 1915).

84 S.E. 583 (Atlanta & Carolina Railway v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Servisco, Inc. v. R. B. M. of Atlanta, Inc.
250 S.E.2d 10 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)