Atlanta Bowling Alleys Inc. v. Harrison

157 S.E. 95, 172 Ga. 388, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 102
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 26, 1931·No. No. 7938·Published

Opinions

Atkinson, J.

1. Upon a proper construction, the special tax of $50, provided for in paragraph 47 of the general tax act of 1927 (Ga. L. 1927, pp. 56, 71), is an occupation tax upon business; and the tax upon the business of operating a “bowling-alley” as employed in this act refers to the business and not the character of the equipment or number of alleys employed at the place where the business of operating a bowling-alley is conducted.

2. The judge erred in refusing to enjoin collection of the alleged delinquent taxe.s demanded on the basis of the number of “beds” or “alleys” for bowling, constituting parts of the equipment in each place of business conducted by the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., and Gilbert, J., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atlanta Bowling Alleys Inc. v. Harrison, 157 S.E. 95, 172 Ga. 388, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 102 (Ga. 1931).

157 S.E. 95 (Atlanta Bowling Alleys Inc. v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodwin v. Mayor of Savannah
53 Ga. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)
Johnston v. Mayor of Macon
62 Ga. 645 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Sawtell v. City of Atlanta
75 S.E. 982 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Price v. Richardson
125 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)