Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith
65 S.E. 405, 133 Ga. 215, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 191
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Ga. 725 →
Opinion
The members of the court are equally divided as to whether there should be a new trial of this ease. Eish, C. J., and Lumpkin and Atkinson, JJ., are of the opinion that a new trial should be granted because of certain rulings of the court complained of. Evans, P. J., and Beck and Holden, JJ., are of the opinion that no errors of law were committed, and that the verdict is supported by the evidence. The judgment of the court below, therefore, stands affirmed by operation of law.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith, 65 S.E. 405, 133 Ga. 215, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 191 (Ga. 1909).
65 S.E. 405 (Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.