Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Allegood

65 S.E. 689, 6 Ga. App. 680, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 5, 1909
Docket1765
StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 689 (Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Allegood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. Allegood, 65 S.E. 689, 6 Ga. App. 680, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The exceptions of law are without substantial merit. This is the second verdict for the plaintiff, and it is fully supported by the evidence. No reason appears for a third trial. Judgment affirmed.

Argued May 5, — Decided October 5, 1909. Rosser & Brandon-, Colquitt & Conyers, J. A. Wilkes, for plaintiff in error. Shipp & Kline, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 689, 6 Ga. App. 680, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-birmingham-atlantic-railroad-v-allegood-gactapp-1909.