Atkinson v. Yarborough

85 S.E. 355, 16 Ga. App. 352, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atkinson v. Yarborough. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Ga. App. 781
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 17, 1915·No. 5946·Published

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

When this case was formerly before this court upon the question as to the correctness of a judgment overruling a general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition (13 Ga. App. 781, 80 S. E. 29), the court said, “The question of comparative negligence raised by the pleadings presents issues of fact which can properly be determined only by a jury.” The plaintiff offered testimony to sustain all the material allegations of her petition, and, the jury having returned a verdict in her favor, this court can not interfere therewith. Judgment affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Yarborough, 85 S.E. 355, 16 Ga. App. 352, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 624 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

85 S.E. 355 (Atkinson v. Yarborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkinson v. Yarborough
80 S.E. 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)