Atkinson v. Williams
This text of 1 Rec. Co. Ct. 53 (Atkinson v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Suffolk County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Theoder Atkinson Senr plantiff against Cap* John Williams Defend* according to Attachm* Dated the 24th of January 1670. The Court (haueing considere the Attachm* with what was producd & proud in Court against the plantiff Theoder Atkinson) doe Judge that as there was no ground of Action, soe it was a vexatiose suite [54]*54contrary to ye Law title baratry1 & therefore fine him tenn pounds fine to the County & fees of Court standing comitted till the Sentance be performd. Theoder Atkinson appealed from this Sentance to the next Court of Assistants & the sd Theo: Atkinson in tenn pounds & Peter Brackett & Tho: Matson sen* in fiue pounds apeice acknowledged themselves bound to . . . prosecute his appeale ... & in y° meane tyme bee of good behauior.
[ John Williams was a merchant “ of Southwark near London,” and Theodore Atkinson a feltmaker of Boston. This case had been dragged from one court to another for a space of ten years or more. It is adequately dealt with up to this point in the printed Records of the Court of Assistants, iii. 137-8,147, 203-7, and the unfavorable result of an appeal from this judgment to the Court of Assistants, March 12,1671/72, is on p. 215. See also below, pp. 95, 247. In the meantime, owing to a disagreement of bench and jury in the Court of Assistants on September 5, 1671, (on the occasion of an earlier appeal), the General Court heard the case, October 8, 1672. It judged that Williams should recover 2171 16s 3d from Atkinson, and issued a writ of execution (return of writ December 3, 1673 is in S. F. 1276.18; cf. Records of Massachusetts Bay, iv2, p. 539, 571). Atkinson appealed again to the General Court, October 19, 1672 (original signed in S. F. 1276.26), and apparently in vain. Not discouraged by these successive rebuffs, Anthony Checldey, attorney for Atkinson, attempted a new action against Williams in the County Court on January 27, 1673/74 (S.F. 1276.35), on the ground that the premises seized under the previous writ of execution really belonged to his daughter Abigail Atkinson. At its January session in 1673/74 this Court again decided against Atkinson (see below, p. 372). Checkley’s reasons of appeal from that judgment are in S. F. 1276.36; Williams’s answer, in S. F. 1276.37.
Some of the earlier papers in the case are here reproduced for the light they may throw on Boston commerce and the fur trade between 1650 and 1660. Many others may be found in S. F. 1276 and S. F. 669. The first is a copy “owned” by Williams October 27, 1670, as attests John Pyncheon (S. F. 1276.44):
The 11th of Aprill:1659
mr Atkinson I thought good to Answer youre letter that you sent to mee Concerning our agreement, when you was with mee it was this, that what Goods I [55]*55sent you & stood to the Aduenture of, them you were to allow mee 221 in the 100: & you were to make mee Returnes the same yeare, if not you were to allow mee 8h in the 100: for Interest & I haue sent you none but what was on my Owne Aduenture, both to you & back to mee againe, Except these Goods that I sent to you the last yeare, 1711 pounds 19s, & 6d, And the produce of them I shall Expect that you stand to the Aduenture of them to mee, & because that most of them were goods, that you did not write to mee for, & you Complaine that the hatts came to a bad market therefore I shall desire but uery reasonable profitt, which will bee but fourteene pounds, if soe you send mee returnes this yeare, wch will bee in all for them, 188119s And Concerning the goods that were in mr Garret, you say they were on my Account, I suppose the Bill of Lading doth not proue it soe to bee, but howeuer, you did ouer rate youre goods Iron was sold for 161 per Tunn, & likewise youre beauer was Ouer rated, I suppose if God should bring you heere againe, you & I should agree about it I hope; the Beauer you sent the last yeare I sold for the best aduantage for you; but not for my selfe, for I haue not receiued all the money for it yet, And that beauer you sent this yeare by mr Lock, I did proffer it to seuerall men & could get but 8s per1 for it, & haue giuen till about August next to pay for it, there is loss in it, & more in that that came in Parker & Pearse ships but I could not helpe it. I beleiue if you had benn heere your selfe, you would not haue made soe much of it as I did, I wrote to you seuerall times, that I sent you a hogshead of hatts, about October, the same yeare you were at London, the which ship had a long passage, it was about February following before Shee Ariued at new England, there was in the Hogshead, 271 11s worth of hatts, but you would neuer since write to mee of the receiuing of them, & I wonder at it, if you had not receiued them I might haue receiued them of the master, you write to mee that the goods in Garrets ship was on my account, but I pray Consider that you were to send to mee on youre Owne aduenture, the spring following after you were heere, the sume of Two hundred & seauenty pounds & I haue receiued noe more since on youre aduenture but: 1981 beside what you haue ordered mee to pay to others & that was in Bills of Exchange
I haue heere sent you an Account, what I haue receiued & what I haue pajd since this time Twelue month
Usd
Receiued of mr Peake 71:12.6 .071:12:06
Receiued of Capt: Hunt, 41 for interest. 034:00:00
Receiued of mr Waterman . 50:00:00
Receiued for Goods that came in Parker & Pearse .104:16:10
Receiued & shall for goods that came in Lock.. 70:17:00
Receiued of mr Sands the bill . 46:00:00
377:06:04
Paid for fraight & other Charge of the goods that came in Parker &
Pearse ships. 02:13:07
Pajd for goods that came in Lock . 01:03:06
Pajd mr Willtey . 03:03:06
Pajd mr Daniell. 10:00:00
Pajd mr Briggs . 10:00:00
[56]*56pajd John Reuell 121 . 12:00:00
Pajd to Humphery More . 10:00:00
Pajd to John Reuell . 10:00:00
Pajd for protesting mr Coles Bill . 00:05:00
59:05:03
Mr Coales bill I haue sent you by the 3 Freinds & goods with an Inuoyce, the bill of 801 oft charged on Cap4 Hunt hee say that hee haue nothing in his hand of his that Charges it on him, but when hee haue hee will pay it. you write to me that you would send on my Account 2001 I pray send it in the Prudent Mary, if it please God to bring it to you, & what more you send on my Account Send it by mr Pearse, or whome you will if any other come, musquash skins will not yeald aboue 7d mincks & Pox will yeald 2s: there is less loss in the best beauer but for that which is meane will sell but for little & Rackoones must bee good to yeald 12d Easterne moose was sould for 30d & some for 8 groates a pound, I sould youre fine Southerne skins for 41: soe hauing noe more to trouble you with, I rest hoping to see you heere the next spring if God permití:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Rec. Co. Ct. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-williams-nysuffolkctyct-1672.