Atkinson v. Wiggins

69 Ala. 190
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 69 Ala. 190 (Atkinson v. Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkinson v. Wiggins, 69 Ala. 190 (Ala. 1881).

Opinion

STONE, J.

The present suit was commenced by attachment, issued by, and returnable before a justice of the peace in Covington county. The attachment was sued out to enforce the statutory lien of a landlord for alleged advances made to his tenant, the sum claimed being for money and provisions ad- ■ vaneed to said tenant to enable him to make a crop on the lands • of the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded in abatement that when the suit was brought, and ever afterwards, he had been : and was a resident householder and freeholder of another county. .Plaintiff demurred to this plea, and the court overruled his de-.murrer. Plaintiff then replied that the suit had been com[191]*191menced by attachment, and tbe court sustained a demurrer to this replication; and plaintiff declining to plead further, there was judgment for the defendant.

The Circuit Court erred in. overruling plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea in abatement. Section 3606 of the Code of 1876, which requires that suits before justices shall be brought in the precinct of the defendant’s permanent residence, or in the precinct in which the debt was created, or in.which the cause of .action arose, is confined in its operation to suits commenced by summons, under sections 3604-5, immediately preceding. It has no reference to suits by attachment of goods, which are in their nature proceedings in rem. — Herndon v. Givens, 16 Ala. 261.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. P. Harris Motor Co. v. Bailey
121 So. 33 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Edmunds v. State, ex rel. Dedge
74 So. 965 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Baum
81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 386 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1910)
Stevenson v. Burton
108 Ala. 154 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Hoagland v. Wilcox
60 N.W. 376 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
McPhillips v. Hubbard
97 Ala. 512 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Ala. 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-wiggins-ala-1881.