Atkinson v. Warren
93 P.2d 157, 34 Cal. App. 2d 119, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 15, 1939
DocketCiv. No. 12396
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 93 P.2d 157 (Atkinson v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Atkinson v. Warren, 93 P.2d 157, 34 Cal. App. 2d 119, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 90 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939).
Opinion
COURT. The petition is denied for the reason that the facts alleged therein are insufficient to justify the issuance of a writ of mandate in accordance with the prayer of the petition.
White, J., was in favor of the issuance of said writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McPheeters v. Board of Medical Examiners
187 P.2d 116 (California Court of Appeal, 1947)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 P.2d 157, 34 Cal. App. 2d 119, 1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-warren-calctapp-1939.