Atkinson v. State

650 So. 2d 1035, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 780, 1995 WL 39884
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atkinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11642
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1995·No. No. 94-1825·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order placing appellant on probation. Because appellant pleaded guilty to the charge he cannot “reserve the right” to appeal an order denying suppression of evidence. Mitchell v. State, 435 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). It appears, however, from the minutes of the court, that perhaps the trial judge permitted appellant to reserve the right to appeal after tendering his plea of guilty. We have no transcript of the plea proceedings, so we cannot tell if that is so. If it is, then appel[1036]*1036lant should be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty and proceed to trial.

APPEAL DISMISSED, REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. State, 650 So. 2d 1035, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 780, 1995 WL 39884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

650 So. 2d 1035 (Atkinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. State
435 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)