Atkinson v. Southern Express Co.

78 S.E. 520, 94 S.C. 457, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atkinson v. Southern Express Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 S.C. 444
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 14, 1913·No. 8546·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Gary.

The facts in this case are in all respects similar to those in the case of W. W. Atkinson v. Southern Express Company (in which the opinion has just been filed) except that in the present case, the action arose in Kershaw county, where, under the local option laws, the sale of liquor is prohibited, while the other case arose in Rich-land county, where the sale of liquor is not prohibited.

Under the principles announced in the opinion, which has just been filed, this defense is immaterial.

It is the judgment of this Court that the petitioner is entitled to the order of injunction for which he prays.

Mr. Justice Fraser

dissents for reasons expressed in opinion in previous case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Southern Express Co., 78 S.E. 520, 94 S.C. 457, 1913 S.C. LEXIS 171 (S.C. 1913).

78 S.E. 520 (Atkinson v. Southern Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.