Atkinson v. Snow

33 Me. 579

Opinion

Howard, J., orally.

— The record had been read, and was present for the use of either party. It was the same with the advertisement in the newspaper. It was, therefore, immaterial upon which paper the counsel was looking, when he read the advertisement to the jury. It might have been so done, merely for convenience.

To that convenience the Judge might properly assent. The exception was without foundation, and must be overruled.