Atkinson v. Singer Manufacturing Co.
This text of 14 Misc. 630 (Atkinson v. Singer Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This -action was brought , to recover back seventy-five dollars which the respondent; had-deposited, as security for the hpnest performance, by hum of his duties as 'employee of the appellant, , ■ ,
The record shows that he left their employment .by mutual consent upon the ninth, day of February, and. fhis action-was bégun on the twelfth-day of tire same month .and year.- ■
. There was - a strenuous contest .between the parties- . -upon 1 the trial as to whether the agreement was' that a .period of sixty or ninety days must elapse after, the termination of-,the ' employment before the deposit, was tp.be returned-, , :
; The appellant now urges -that the'action w;as prematurely "brought in-;either event;- but;.this objection was not made upon the trial. In fact,, the -attention of the court was called away, from-it..by a conflict over a point that, was really immaterial.
. Under the circumstances we do not feel bound to consider the objection upon appeal, especially, ,as it. does not appear that injustice has-resulted. . - , -
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Bisohoff, J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with cpsts, ■ ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Misc. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-singer-manufacturing-co-nyctcompl-1895.