Atkinson v. Rittenhouse
5 Pa. 103, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 6
This text of 5 Pa. 103 (Atkinson v. Rittenhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Atkinson v. Rittenhouse, 5 Pa. 103, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 6 (Pa. 1847).
Opinion
The wife, in this instance, is" clearly not joined as a plaintiff with her husband; for though there has, • perhaps, been a practice to name them in this manner in the entitling of the action, the husband alone is named as plaintiff in. the declaration. He sues in her right, and cannot recover without her.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cheza v. Repas
50 Pa. D. & C.2d 158 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Pa. 103, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-rittenhouse-pa-1847.