Atkinson v. Rittenhouse
5 Pa. 103, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 6
Opinion
The wife, in this instance, is" clearly not joined as a plaintiff with her husband; for though there has, • perhaps, been a practice to name them in this manner in the entitling of the action, the husband alone is named as plaintiff in. the declaration. He sues in her right, and cannot recover without her.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atkinson v. Rittenhouse, 5 Pa. 103, 1847 Pa. LEXIS 6 (Pa. 1847).
5 Pa. 103 (Atkinson v. Rittenhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cheza v. Repas
50 Pa. D. & C.2d 158 (Mercer County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)