Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co.
This text of 35 Ill. App. 448 (Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record filed by appellant in this case is not certified to be a full copy or transcript of the record, but a “ complete transcript of the record as per praecipe for record tiled.” Appellees subsequently filed an additional record, but that is only certified to be a copy of a certain cross-bill, answer, amended and supplemental cross-bill, and of certain orders in the cause. ¡No case is presented, therefore, upon which we can find that any error was committed, as it is impossible to say that we have a complete record before us. Frink v. Phelps, 4 Scam. 558; Bertrand v. Taylor, 87 Ill. 235; Blake v. Miller, 18 Ill. App. 645.
The decree is affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Ill. App. 448, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-linden-steel-co-illappct-1890.