Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co.

35 Ill. App. 448, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 594
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided March 10, 1890·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Garnett, J.

The record filed by appellant in this case is not certified to be a full copy or transcript of the record, but a “ complete transcript of the record as per praecipe for record tiled.” Appellees subsequently filed an additional record, but that is only certified to be a copy of a certain cross-bill, answer, amended and supplemental cross-bill, and of certain orders in the cause. ¡No case is presented, therefore, upon which we can find that any error was committed, as it is impossible to say that we have a complete record before us. Frink v. Phelps, 4 Scam. 558; Bertrand v. Taylor, 87 Ill. 235; Blake v. Miller, 18 Ill. App. 645.

The decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co., 35 Ill. App. 448, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 594 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

35 Ill. App. 448 (Atkinson v. Linden Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reis v. Pitzele
63 Ill. App. 47 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Springer v. Maddock
59 Ill. App. 40 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Tolman v. Wheeler
57 Ill. App. 342 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Culver v. Schroth
54 Ill. App. 643 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
North v. Alles
50 Ill. App. 266 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)
O'Neil v. Schaar
50 Ill. App. 308 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1893)