Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co.
200 S.E. 141, 187 Ga. 240, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 768
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 Ga. 379 →
Opinion
This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who arc evenly divided .in opinion, Russell, Chief Justice, Atkinson, Presiding Justice, and Bell, Justice, being of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and Jenkins, Grice, and Duckworth, Justices, being of the contrary opinion, the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 200 S.E. 141, 187 Ga. 240, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 768 (Ga. 1938).
200 S.E. 141 (Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.