Atkinson v. . Everett

19 S.E. 659, 114 N.C. 670
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 S.E. 659 (Atkinson v. . Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkinson v. . Everett, 19 S.E. 659, 114 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1894).

Opinion

From an order continuing the injunction to the hearing the defendants appealed.

The affidavit of plaintiff E. B. Atkinson, which was supported by affidavits of C. E. Graham and others similar in substance, was as follows:

1. That about 1885 R. V. Welch and the heirs of J. R. Love, and perhaps others interested, conveyed to the late Clarke Whittier a large tract of land containing about from 75,000 to 80,000 acres, lying in Swain County on the north side of the Western North Carolina Railroad, and on the north side of the Tuckaseigee River, and now commonly known as the Whittier lands, at the price of $50,000, (671) of which sum, as affiant is informed and believes, $10,000 was paid at the time of said conveyance, and the remainder secured by a deed of trust executed by said Clarke Whittier to W. L. Hilliard, conveying the said lands to said Hilliard as trustee in trust to secure the payment of the remainder of said purchase-money. That since said first above-mentioned conveyance, as affiant is informed and believes, various amounts have been paid upon said remainder of said purchase-money until the balance now due thereon does not exceed the sum of $15,000. That said trustee, Hilliard, died on or about 11 October, 1890, and the defendant W. A. Gibson has been duly appointed trustee in *Page 414 his place. That on or about 17 May, 1887, the said Clarke Whittier died, leaving a last will and testament, which has been duly admitted to probate in said county of Swain, and the defendant E. Everett, on 7 October, 1889, was duly appointed administrator cum testamento annexo of said Whittier.

2. That on or about 2 August, 1890, the said defendant Everett, as by said will he was duly authorized to do, conveyed the lands hereinbefore described to Natt Atkinson, C. E. Graham and J. M. Thrash for the price of $40,000. That of this sum $8,000 was paid to said Everett on or about 2 August, 1890, and the said Natt Atkinson, C. E. Graham and J. M. Thrash executed their promissory notes under seal to said Everett for $32,000, copies of which are hereto annexed, except one note for $6,000 which was not embodied in deed of trust to Fry, and to secure the payment of the same conveyed said lands to A. M. Fry, trustee, in trust to sell said lands under certain conditions named in said trust deed. That of the said sum of $40,000 there is still due said (672) Everett about the sum of $16,000, with some interest, upon the conditions hereinafter mentioned.

3. That on or about 15 August, 1890, the said Natt Atkinson, C. E. Graham and J. M. Thrash sold to B. L. Duke an undivided fourth interest, for which said Duke has paid about $23,400, and since said sale to said Duke said Natt Atkinson has conveyed the remainder of his interest in said land to E. B. Atkinson and C. B. Atkinson, two of the plaintiffs above named, and the said C. E. Graham has conveyed his interest in said land to the plaintiff M. S. Ray, wife of the plaintiff J. E. Ray.

4. That since the conveyance to said Duke he has made an assignment, as affiant is informed and believes, of all his property, including his interest in said land, to the plaintiffs, V. Ballard and J. F. Wily, as his assignees.

5. That the plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple of said lands, subject to liens for unpaid purchase-money, provided the titles of those who conveyed the same to said Clarke Whittier were not defective. That, as affiant is informed and believes, the vendors of said Clarke Whittier did not have or convey to said Whittier a good and indefeasible title to all of said lands, but on the contrary there are large parcels of the same held and claimed by other persons under grant from the State and mesne conveyances.

6. That, as affiant is informed and believes, there is now an action pending in the county of Swain, or in the Supreme Court, between the heirs of one Allison as plaintiffs and R. V. Welch, and the heirs of said Clarke Whittier as defendants, wherein said plaintiffs claim to be the owners of an undivided sixth interest in the whole of said lands. *Page 415

7. That by express stipulation in the notes executed by said Natt Atkinson, C. E. Graham and J. M. Thrash to the defendant E. Everett, administrator of said Clarke Whittier, said notes were (673) not transferable or payable until all liens and liabilities on or against the land are paid and discharged, but, notwithstanding said express stipulation, the defendant A. M. Fry, trustee in the deed of trust of said land, to secure said notes, professing to act under the power conferred on him by said deed, but in flagrant violation of said stipulation contained in said notes, has advertised said land for sale to pay said notes, and threatens and intends, unless restrained, to sell the same at the courthouse in said county of Swain, on or about 31 January, instant; that said Fry is acting in concert with his confederates, Everett and Gibson and Welch, as affiant is informed and believes, that each of these defendants knows that all liens and liabilities on said lands have not been paid or discharged, and also knows the title to such of said lands is in dispute, and cannot be settled until after protracted litigation; that affiant is informed and believes that the defendant Welch has threatened that if the defendants Everett and Fry shall be restrained from selling said lands he will have the same advertised and sold under the deed of trust from Clarke Whittier to W. L. Hilliard by the defendant Gibson, who has been appointed trustee in the place of Hilliard.

Affiant further swears that the heirs of Clarke Whittier all reside beyond the limits of the State, and if said Everett, administrator, is permitted to collect said purchase-money and pay the same or any part thereof to said Whittier heirs, these plaintiffs will not be able to recover the same without great trouble and expense, and perhaps not at all, for affiant does not know that said Whittier heirs, or any of them, are solvent.

8. Affiant is informed and believes there exists an agreement between the defendant Everett and those entitled to receive the remainder of the purchase-money from the estate of said Clarke Whittier that only the interest shall be required to be paid until all claims and (674) encumbrances shall be removed from said lands, now that a sum sufficient has been paid to said Everett to pay said interest.

Affiant adds that, as he is informed and believes, there are several thousand acres of said lands, lying near the center of the northwest end of the tract, claimed by the Foster heirs, and known as the Foster grant, which the plaintiffs will not probably be able to hold. At all events, as affiant believes, the claim of said Foster heirs will be litigated and considerable time and expense will be required to procure a settlement of the dispute. *Page 416

The plaintiff have commenced an action against the defendants for an injunction, etc. The plaintiffs pray that the defendants, their agents, servants and employees, be restrained and enjoined from selling said lands, and for such other relief as the facts case may entitle them to have.

The stipulation or condition contained in the notes was as follows:

"But this note is not payable or transferable until all liens and liabilities on and against the lands in Swain County, N.C. known as the `Whittier lands' are paid or discharged."

E. Everett, one of the above-named defendants, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. That he is informed and believes that paragraph 1 of the affidavit filed by E. B. Atkinson is true, except that there is not more than the sum of $14,000 due on these notes secured by deed of trust executed by Clarke Whittier to W. L. Hilliard, trustee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Finance Corp. v. Roos
47 S.W.2d 142 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 S.E. 659, 114 N.C. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-everett-nc-1894.