Atkinson v. Drew
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6426
EVERETTE ATKINSON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
DARLENE DREW,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (9:09-cv-03219-TLW)
Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everette Atkinson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Everette Atkinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Atkinson’s 28
U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkinson v. Drew,
No. 9:09-cv-03219-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atkinson v. Drew (Atkinson v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.