Atkinson v. Drew

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2010·No. 10-6426·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6426

EVERETTE ATKINSON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DREW,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (9:09-cv-03219-TLW)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Everette Atkinson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Everette Atkinson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Atkinson’s 28

U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkinson v. Drew,

No. 9:09-cv-03219-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Drew, (4th Cir. 2010).

Atkinson v. Drew (Atkinson v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241