Atkinson v. Drake

89 S.E.2d 888, 212 Ga. 26, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 529
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 11, 1955·No. 19065·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Where the only equitable relief sought was an injunction against the obstruction or closing of a private way after the obstruction had been placed therein, the petition was subject to general demurrer, since there was an available remedy at law under Code §83-119. Haney v. Sheppard, 207 Ga. 158 (60 S. E. 2d 453). Hence the amendment thereto, alleging that the plaintiff had removed the obstructions and the defendant “threatens to re-erect and unless restrained will re-erect and . . . close the driveway,” fails to breathe life into the lifeless petition no matter how good a cause of action the amended petition might now allege as to the alleged threats. See Code §§ 81-1302, 81-1303. It follows that the court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition as amended.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Drake, 89 S.E.2d 888, 212 Ga. 26, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 529 (Ga. 1955).

89 S.E.2d 888 (Atkinson v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkinson v. Drake
93 S.E.2d 702 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Johnson v. Willingham
92 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)