Atkinson v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

Eleventh Circuit

Atkinson v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections

677 F. App'x 628

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2017

DocketNo. 15-14039 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 677 F. App'x 628 (Atkinson v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atkinson v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, 677 F. App'x 628 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this Eighth Amendment case for an alleged painful injury, we vacate the grant of summary judgment for Defendant Thomas. Viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the evidence shows that Plaintiff’s arm could be observed to be already in a sling at the time of the occurrence underlying the claim, Plaintiff gave spoken notice to the Defendant officer about Plaintiffs recent shoulder surgery, and Defendant said expressly that he cared “nothing about” Plaintiffs shoulder before setting on Plaintiff. In the light of this evidence and the other now-assumed circumstances of this case, we conclude that a jury could find for Plaintiff on this record.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this Eighth Amendment case for an alleged painful injury, we vacate the grant of summary judgment for Defendant Thomas. Viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the evidence shows that Plaintiff’s arm could be observed to be already in a sling at the time of the occurrence underlying the claim, Plaintiff gave spoken notice to the Defendant officer about Plaintiffs recent shoulder surgery, and Defendant said expressly that he cared “nothing about” Plaintiffs shoulder before setting on Plaintiff. In the light of this evidence and the other now-assumed circumstances of this case, we conclude that a jury could find for Plaintiff on this record.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 F. App'x 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-commissioner-georgia-department-of-corrections-ca11-2017.