Atkinson v. Boardman

2 F. Cas. 97
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 F. Cas. 97 (Atkinson v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkinson v. Boardman, 2 F. Cas. 97 (circtsdny 1851).

Opinion

1851.

Suit to Invalídate Patent Granted alter Interference—Hearing—Evidence.

1. Upon a hill filed to declare a patent granted by the commissioner, after an interference, invalid or inoperative, under section 16 of the act of [July 4,] 1836, [5 Stat. 123,] amended by section_10 of the act of [March 3,] 1839, [5 Stat. 354,] the hearing is altogether independent of that before the commissioner, and takes place upon such testimony as the parties may see fit to produce, agreeably to the rules and practice of a court of equity.

2. The evidence before the commissioner is not evidence in such a suit, except by consent of parties; nor are the parties to the suit restricted to the testimony used before the commissioner. Either party is at liberty to introduce additional evidence.

[NOTE. Nowhere reported. Opinion by NELSON, Circuit Justice, not now accessible. Statement of points determined taken from Law Pat. Dig. 265,666.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyatt v. Kappos
625 F.3d 1320 (Federal Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F. Cas. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-boardman-circtsdny-1851.