Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A.

492 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2016 WL 1576473

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 2016

DocketWD 78863

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.3d 177 (Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A., 492 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2016 WL 1576473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Lori F. and Mr. David F. Atkins appeal the judgment dismissing, for lack of personal jurisdiction, their claims for abuse of process, prima facie tort, and fraud over the efforts of Summit Bank, N.A., a Florida-based institution, to recover damages from Mr. Atkins’s alleged default on a promissory note.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Lori F. and Mr. David F. Atkins appeal the judgment dismissing, for lack of personal jurisdiction, their claims for abuse of process, prima facie tort, and fraud over the efforts of Summit Bank, N.A., a Florida-based institution, to recover damages from Mr. Atkins’s alleged default on a promissory note.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2016 WL 1576473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-summit-bank-na-moctapp-2016.