Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A.

492 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2016 WL 1576473
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 2016·No. WD 78863·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per Curiam:

Ms. Lori F. and Mr. David F. Atkins appeal the judgment dismissing, for lack of personal jurisdiction, their claims for abuse of process, prima facie tort, and fraud over the efforts of Summit Bank, N.A., a Florida-based institution, to recover damages from Mr. Atkins’s alleged default on a promissory note.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A., 492 S.W.3d 177, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 384, 2016 WL 1576473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

492 S.W.3d 177 (Atkins v. Summit Bank N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.