Atkins v. State

303 So. 2d 359
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 22, 1974·No. No. 74-351·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Shepherd v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 880; Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 105; Pearson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 616; Jernigan v. State, Fla.1969, 228 So.2d 273; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 1; Quartz v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 283. Compare Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 862; Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 29; Palladino v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 837.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkins v. State, 303 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

303 So. 2d 359 (Atkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McArthur v. State
303 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)