Atkins v. Shalala
61 F.3d 751, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6293, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21066, 1995 WL 468557
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 9, 1995·No. No. 94-35020·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
We determine that the opinion of the district court, Atkins v. Shalala, 837 F.Supp. 318 (D.Or.1993), is correct in all aspects and it is adopted as the opinion of this Court.
The Judgment of the district court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atkins v. Shalala, 61 F.3d 751, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6293, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21066, 1995 WL 468557 (9th Cir. 1995).
61 F.3d 751 (Atkins v. Shalala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atkins v. Apfel
46 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (D. Oregon, 1999)
58 soc.sec.rep.ser. 180, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6762, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9407 Harold Atkins v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Nos. 96-35756, 96-36001
154 F.3d 986 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Atkins v. Apfel
154 F.3d 986 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)