Atkins v. Scott
This text of 19 Wis. 136 (Atkins v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
We cannot grant a new trial in this case, although the weight of evidence, as it is returned to this court, would seem to be against the verdict. There is great conflict of testimony upon the point whether the certificates were taken by the plaintiffs in payment of their goods and at their own risk, or not. It was the peculiar province of the jury to decide upon this conflict. They saw the witnesses, their manner of testifying, and could best judge what credit to give their conflicting statements. Besides, the bill of exceptions [137]*137does not state that it contains all the material evidence given on the trial. Under these circumstances, we could not reverse the judgment, even if we thought the weight of evidence, as contained in the bill of exceptions, was in favor of the plaintiffs.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Wis. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-scott-wis-1865.