Atkins v. Saunders

Fourth Circuit

Atkins v. Saunders

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17363, 1995 WL 310170

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 22, 1995

Docket94-7197

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 772 (Atkins v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atkins v. Saunders, 54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17363, 1995 WL 310170 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.M. SAUNDERS; D.Z. Campbell; Correctional Officer
Stidham; Sergeant Pettry; Correctional Officer
Fitzgerald; Correctional Officer
Kirkpatrick, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7197.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Saunders, No. CA-93-695 (W.D.Va. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Anthony ATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.M. SAUNDERS; D.Z. Campbell; Correctional Officer
Stidham; Sergeant Pettry; Correctional Officer
Fitzgerald; Correctional Officer
Kirkpatrick, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7197.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

Anthony Atkins, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Atkins v. Saunders, No. CA-93-695 (W.D.Va. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for production of documents

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 772, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17363, 1995 WL 310170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-saunders-ca4-1995.