Atkins v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Atkins v. O'Brien

647 F. App'x 254

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2016·No. No. 15-7948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[255]*255Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Atkins, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atkins’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district .court. Atkins v. O’Brien, No. 2:14-cv-00036-JPB-JES (ND.W.Va. Nov. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[255]*255Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Atkins, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atkins’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district .court. Atkins v. O’Brien, No. 2:14-cv-00036-JPB-JES (ND.W.Va. Nov. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Atkins v. O'Brien, 647 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

647 F. App'x 254 (Atkins v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related