Atkins v. O'Brien
This text of 647 F. App'x 254 (Atkins v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[255]*255Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eugene Atkins, II, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Atkins’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district .court. Atkins v. O’Brien, No. 2:14-cv-00036-JPB-JES (ND.W.Va. Nov. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 F. App'x 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-obrien-ca4-2016.