Atkins v. Hartman
This text of 15 A.D.2d 865 (Atkins v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm only upon the stated ground that the verdict was against the weight of the credible evidence. The other assigned reason that the jury did not understand the charge has no validity. (Appeal by defendant from order of Cattaraugus Trial Term setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial upon the grounds that the verdict in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant was insufficient in amount, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 A.D.2d 865, 224 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1962.