Atkins v. Farley
This text of 508 F. App'x 265 (Atkins v. Farley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[266]*266Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David Atkins appeals the district court’s order granting the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Defendant Schwartz, granting the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Defendants Farley, Sears, Shank, and Shortell, and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Farley, No. 7:11cv00592, 2012 WL 3201895 (W.D.Va. Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
508 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-farley-ca4-2013.