Atkins v. Emram

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 2010
Docket10-6915
StatusUnpublished

This text of Atkins v. Emram (Atkins v. Emram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkins v. Emram, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6915

DAVID ATKINS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KHAIRUL B. EMRAM, Doctor; SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden; HARVARD W. STEPHENS, O.H.S. Medical Director; LINDA SHEAR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 7, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Anne Grace, WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER, LLP, McLean, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Atkins v. Emram, No. 1:09-cv-00839-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va.

June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Atkins v. Emram, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-emram-ca4-2010.