Atkins v. Atkins

340 S.E.2d 537, 287 S.C. 587, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 270
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 10, 1986
Docket22469
StatusPublished

This text of 340 S.E.2d 537 (Atkins v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkins v. Atkins, 340 S.E.2d 537, 287 S.C. 587, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 270 (S.C. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from a circuit court order affirming a probate court order that revoked the decedent’s will as to all personal property and the real property situated in South Carolina. The probate court held that respondent Alice Atkins, the decedent’s wife, was entitled to one-third of his property by intestacy. We affirm.

The parties stipulated the facts as follows. In 1976, while domiciled in Virginia, the decedent executed this will. He married Alice Atkins four years later. They were domiciled in South Carolina when decedent died in 1984. The will does not expressly provide that it was made in contemplation of marriage and it makes no provision for the decedent’s wife. The decedent was survived by his wife and two children from a prior marriage.

Pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 21-7-220 (1976), a subsequent marriage revokes a will unless the will expresses on its face that it was made in contemplation of marriage and provides for the future wife. Jackson v. Cannon, 266 S. C. 198, 222 S. E. (2d) 494 (1976). The sole issue on appeal is whether South Carolina law applies to determine revocation of the will. 1

The validity of a will as to personal property is determined by the law of the testator’s last domicile. Collins v. Collins, 219 S. C. 1, 63 S. E. (2d) 811 (1951); Bradley v. Lowry, 17 S. C. Eq. (Speers Eq.) 1 (1842). The inheritance of real property is determined by the law of the real property’s situs. Lamar v. Scott, 34 S. C. L. (3 Strob.) 562 (1849).

Because South Carolina was the decedent’s last domicile and is the situs of the real property, South Carolina law *589 clearly applies to determine the validity of these provisions in the will. The probate court and the circuit court therefore correctly applied S. C. Code Ann. § 21-7-220 (1976) to revoke the will and properly divided the property according to South Carolina intestacy law. See S. C. Code Ann. § 21-3-20(1) (1976).

Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.

1

Under Virginia Law, a subsequent marriage does not revoke a will. Va. Code Ann. § 64.1-58.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Collins
63 S.E.2d 811 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1951)
Jackson v. Cannon Ex Rel. Estate of Watson
222 S.E.2d 494 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 S.E.2d 537, 287 S.C. 587, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-atkins-sc-1986.