Atkins v. Atkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Atkins v. Atkins

114 A.D.2d 394, 494 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53072

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 394 (Atkins v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atkins v. Atkins, 114 A.D.2d 394, 494 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Donovan, J.), dated April 26, 1984, as awarded custody of the parties’ two infant daughters to the plaintiff wife, directed the sale of the marital residence, awarded the plaintiff a portion of defendant’s pension, should he receive one, and directed defendant to pay the plaintiffs counsel a fee in the amount of $1,500.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to defendant’s claims, our examination of the record reveals that the trial court’s awards in question are supported by the proof presented. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Donovan, J.), dated April 26, 1984, as awarded custody of the parties’ two infant daughters to the plaintiff wife, directed the sale of the marital residence, awarded the plaintiff a portion of defendant’s pension, should he receive one, and directed defendant to pay the plaintiffs counsel a fee in the amount of $1,500.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to defendant’s claims, our examination of the record reveals that the trial court’s awards in question are supported by the proof presented. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 394, 494 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-v-atkins-nyappdiv-1985.