Atkins, John Louis
This text of Atkins, John Louis (Atkins, John Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,551-01
EX PARTE JOHN LOUIS ATKINS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20106 (B) 1 IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TAYLOR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to sixty-seven years’ imprisonment. The
Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Atkins v. State, No. 11-18-00056-CR (Tex.
App.— Eastland Mar. 19, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this application
for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this
Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
In a single ground, Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform him that
his conviction was affirmed. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex
parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2005). The trial court signed a timely order designating issues directing appellate counsel to 2
respond in an affidavit, but the record was forwarded before counsel responded and the trial court
made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to
complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings and conclusions.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order and determine whether Applicant was denied his right to file a petition for
discretionary review. In doing so, the trial court shall determine whether the affidavit in the record
signed by Jessica Alexander is genuine and credible. The district clerk shall then immediately
forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand,
including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions,
orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any
extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Atkins, John Louis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkins-john-louis-texcrimapp-2020.