Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
This text of 453 N.E.2d 522 (Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 AD2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 N.E.2d 522, 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkin-v-union-processing-corp-ny-1983.