Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.

453 N.E.2d 522, 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3241
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1983·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 AD2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkin v. Union Processing Corp., 453 N.E.2d 522, 59 N.Y.2d 919, 466 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3241 (N.Y. 1983).

453 N.E.2d 522 (Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanley v. Williamson
186 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Rattenni
179 A.D.2d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Abrams
520 N.E.2d 535 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Woodruff v. Castaldo
113 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Kick v. Regan
110 A.D.2d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Wasilkowski v. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital
109 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Eastern Ambulance Service, Inc.
106 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Atlantic-Inland, Inc. v. Town of Union
126 Misc. 2d 509 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Waters v. Glasheen
103 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Union Processing Corp. v. Atkin Et Al.
465 U.S. 1038 (Supreme Court, 1984)