Home/New York Court of Appeals/Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm

224 N.E.2d 723, 18 N.Y.2d 980, 278 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 30, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 N.E.2d 723 (Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm, 224 N.E.2d 723, 18 N.Y.2d 980, 278 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, upon the majority opinion at the Appellate Division; no opinion.

'Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voolhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Judge Keating concurs in the result upon the ground that the stock had been ‘ ‘ offered to the public in this state ” more than one year before the first sale to plaintiffs. This is evidenced by three actual sales in 1957 and, even more clearly, by quotations of the stock in the ‘ ‘ pink sheets ’ ’ of over-the-counter quotations available to broker-dealers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

H. S. Equities, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
464 F. Supp. 83 (S.D. New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 N.E.2d 723, 18 N.Y.2d 980, 278 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkin-v-hill-darlington-grimm-ny-1966.