Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
This text of 188 N.E.2d 790 (Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders affirmed, without costs. The questions certified on the appeal and the cross appeal answered in the affirmative. Ho opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Foster and Scileppi. Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to modify and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that [943]*943under the applicable statute criminal liability is the exclusive redress for its violation (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 275 N. Y. 125; Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N. Y. 274). The question certified on the cross appeal to this court should be answered in the negative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 N.E.2d 790, 12 N.Y.2d 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkin-v-hill-darlington-grimm-ny-1963.