Atiles v. City of New York

279 A.D.2d 543, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 569
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated October 12, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment as there are questions of fact as to whether it negligently performed repairs at the location of the accident (see, Quinn v City of New York, 271 AD2d 515; cf., Verdes v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 253 AD2d 552). Krausman, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atiles v. City of New York, 279 A.D.2d 543, 719 N.Y.S.2d 611, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

279 A.D.2d 543 (Atiles v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivers v. City of New York
37 A.D.3d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Leon v. Joseph L. Balkan Inc.
29 A.D.3d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Adler v. Suffolk County Water Authority
306 A.D.2d 229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)