Atherton v. State

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 387, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 73
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 19, 1982
DocketNo. 82-CC-0626
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 387 (Atherton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atherton v. State, 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 387, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 73 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1982).

Opinion

Roe, C. J.

This matter coming to be heard upon the motion of Respondent to dismiss the claim herein, due notice having been given and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

Finds that because section 11 — 3 of the Illinois Public Aid Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 23, par. 11 — 3) and Department of Public Aid Rules 4.015 and 4.016 provide that payment for vendor services is absolutely inalienable by assignment, Claimant is ineligible for payment on this claim since he is not the provider of the services.

It is hereby ordered that the motion of Respondent be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the claim herein is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

University of Chicago Professional Services Offices v. State
42 Ill. Ct. Cl. 277 (Court of Claims of Illinois, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 387, 1982 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atherton-v-state-ilclaimsct-1982.